Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Dana Zakat Dalam Hukum Positif Di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61111/jiebsf.v1i1.792الكلمات المفتاحية:
Criminal Management of Zakat، Court Decision، Lex Specialis، Systematis Principleالملخص
This study examines the handling of criminal acts related to the misuse of zakat funds under Indonesian positive law, focusing on government-established zakat management institutions. It employs a normative research methodology using statute, case, and comparative approaches. The first finding reveals that cases of zakat fund misuse are addressed using Article 2(1) in conjunction with Article 3 of the Anti-Corruption Law. A key factor in applying these provisions is that the perpetrator's actions result in financial losses to the state. Another influencing factor is the approach taken by the Public Prosecutor (JPU) in framing the indictment, which primarily relies on the Anti-Corruption Law without referencing provisions in other relevant legislation, such as the Zakat Management Law. This is evident in the primary and subsidiary indictments, where the focus remains on anti-corruption provisions. The second finding highlights that, based on the systematic lex specialis principle, Articles 37 and 40 of the Zakat Management Law are more specific in addressing material, formal, and subject (adresat) aspects of the crime. Consequently, under the principle of systematic specificity, these provisions are more appropriate to apply in cases of zakat fund misuse than the general provisions of the Anti-Corruption Law. Therefore, the study concludes that the legal application by the Panel of Judges in such cases is flawed if it prioritizes the Anti-Corruption Law over the Zakat Management Law. In cases involving criminal acts in zakat management, the Zakat Management Law should serve as the primary legal framework.
المراجع
Bambang Waluyo. (1996). Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Sinar Grafika.
Edward Omar Sharif Hiariej. (2021a). Aasas Lex Specialis Systematis Dan Hukum Pidana Pajak (Principle of Lex Specialist Systematic and Tax Criminal Law). 21, 1–12.
Edward Omar Sharif Hiariej. (2021b). Asas Lex Specialis Systematis dan Hukum Pidana Pajak. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(1), 1–12.
Elwi Danil. (2014). Korupsi: Konsep, Tindak Pidana, Dan Pemberantasannya. Rajawali Pers. tindak pidana korupsi&f=false
Erdianto Efendi. (2011). Hukum Pidana Indonesi Suatu Pengantar. Refika Aditama.
Erja Fitria Virginia dan Eko Soponyono. (2021). Pembaharuan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perpajakan. Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3, 299–311.
Hendrika Beatrix Aprilia Ngape. (2018). Putusan Diluar Surat Dakwaan Penuntut Umum.
Huismant Brant Toripalu. (2019). Appointment of Provincial Secretaries of the House of Representatives through the Approval of the Provincial Council Representatives. 3(3), 239–260.
Januarsyah, M. R. P. & M. P. Z. (2020). Penerapan Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi sebagai Subjek Tindak Pidana dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Permasalahan korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Wawasa Yuridika, 4(2), 240–255.
Jennah, R., & Hidayat, N. A. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Orang Tua Pelaku Eksploitasi Anak Untuk Konten Media Sosial. 8(September), 22–28.
Kejaksaan Negri Bengkulu Selatan. (2021). Jaksa Tetapkan ‘SF’ Tersangka Korupsi BASNAZ. Kejari Bengkulu Selatan.
Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 52 Tahun 2014 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Perhitungan Zakat Mal dan Zakat Fitrah serta Pendayagunaan Zakat untuk Usaha Produktif, (2014).
La Ode Faiki. (2023). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana: Teori Dan Praktik. Mata Kata Inspirasi.
Mahkamah Agung. (2017). Putusan No. 516 K/PID.SUS/2017. Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Indonesia.
Mahmud Mulyadi. (2018). Pendekatan Intregratif Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 13(1).
Nurfaqih Irfani. (2020). Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, dan Lex Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum. Legislasi Indonesia, 16(3), 1–23.
Orba Manullang, S., br Tompul, V., Kusumadewi, Y., & Yesami Krisnalita, L. (2023). Daya Ikat KUHP Nasional terhadap Eksistensi Undang-Undang Khusus Sebelumnya Ditinjau dari Perspektif Filsafat Hukum. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(2), 17340–17346.
PP No. 14 Tahun 2014 tentang Pelaksanaan UU No 23 Tahun 2011 tentang Pengelolaan Zakat, (2014).
Prof. Masruchin Ruba’i. (2021). Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana. MNC Publishing.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padang. (n.d.). Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Indonesia.
Robi Putri J. (2024). Perbedaan Korupsi dan Penggelapan: 1 Perbedaan Signifikat yang Harus Diketahui. Hukum Expert.
Setyonagoro, P. (2019). Wacana Hukum Uji Konstitusionalitas Produk Hukum Peraturan Daerah (Legal Discourse About Testing Constitutionality Of Regional Regulations). Cakrawala, 13.
Triana Dewi Seroja dan Winda Fitri. (2019). Implementasi dan Implikasi Asas Kekhususan Sistematis Pada Tindak Pidana Telekomunikasi. Law and Policy Transformation, 4(2), 104–122.
التنزيلات
منشور
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
